The Chinese People's Liberation Army (PLA) Eastern Theater Command released videos in commemoration of the 97th founding anniversary of the PLA. In one video, segments of four countermeasure missions against "Taiwan independence" secessionist forces were included.
Drawing on classic historical battle examples in China, the video "Battlefield at maritime frontier," adapted from the Peking Opera song "Dingjun Mountain," conveys the message of soldiers being ready to fight at all times and able to engage in battle at any moment.
The video that lasts two minutes and 16 seconds has garnered numerous likes online since its release late Wednesday. The video features classic images of the PLA Eastern Theater Command's combat preparedness patrols and major military operations in recent years.
Among them are segments of the PLA Eastern Theater Command's four countermeasure missions against "Taiwan independence" secessionist forces.
The video showcased the crushing strength of the Eastern Theater Command against the "Taiwan independence" secessionist forces and their military equipment, demonstrating the capability of destroying their "support pillars," striking their "main base," and cutting off their "supply lines."
It conveys the message that each provocation from "Taiwan independence" secessionist forces is met with a step forward of PLA's counteraction.
The ending, presented through fast-paced visuals with a wealth of information, reviews the glorious journey of the PLA from its inception and its course of fighting in the flames of war, and its image in the new era.
It concludes with references to the five famous mountains in Chinese mainland, scenes of Hong Kong, Macao, Taiwan island, and the Great Wall, expressing that the PLA Eastern Theater Command will not forget its original intentions, continue its traditions, remain loyal to its mission, and serve as the iron Great Wall in safeguarding national unity and territorial integrity.
"I cannot tell your name, but in times of hardship, I know that I'm safe; amidst crowds, I feel a sense of security," read the opening lines of another heartwarming video released by the Eastern Theater Command.
This video resonated with the public, highlighting the role of the PLA in safeguarding peace and stability. The narrative continues, "In this war-torn world, you have made peace and beauty a part of my daily life... Though your name remains unknown to me, I know you are the PLA."
Chinese scientists from the Institute of High Energy Physics (IHEP) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) reported on Thursday their discovery of a gamma-ray line with an energy of up to 37 million electron-volts from an extremely bright gamma-ray burst. This represents the highest energy spectral line feature ever emitted by celestial objects in the universe, according to information from the IHEP shared with the Global Times.
The scientists also found that the gamma-ray line evolves according to a power-law function over time, providing crucial clues to unraveling the mystery of the line.
Their paper was published as a cover story in Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy on Thursday.
"These findings provide new and important clues for unraveling the mysteries of gamma-ray bursts and relativistic jets, marking a milestone in the study of gamma-ray bursts," corresponding author of the paper Xiong Shaolin told the Global Times.
Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) are the most energetic explosion phenomena in the universe, which can be produced by either the core collapse of a massive star or the collision of two compact stars, such as neutron stars and black holes.
The abovementioned discoveries of the Chinese scientists were made on the so-called brightest of all time GRB, named GRB 221009A, which belongs to the former category and arrived on Earth on October 9, 2022, and was observed by many telescopes all over the world, according to the IHEP.
Researchers from the IHEP of CAS, the Yunnan observatories of CAS, Hebei Normal University, and Guizhou Normal University have formed a collaboration team and executed a comprehensive analysis of the observation data from two space gamma-ray monitors named GECAM-C and Fermi/GBM. The CAS-funded GECAM-C provided an accurate measurement of the low energy band spectrum of this GRB, while the Fermi/GBM covered the high energy band where the gamma-ray line showed up. In particular, this burst is so bright (too many gamma-ray photons in a short period of time) that the Fermi/GBM detector suffered data loss during the bright part of the burst, making reliable data analysis very difficult. GECAM-C did not experience such a problem thanks to its dedicated design of the instrument; thus, the GECAM-C data was used to correct the Fermi/GBM data, the IHEP noted.
After the very challenging analyses of the data issues, instrumental effects, and background modeling, the research group managed to derive the reliable spectra of the GRB and further identify a series of gamma-ray lines throughout the burst, including the surprising gamma-ray line with energy up to 37 million electron-volts detected during the bright part of the burst. Interestingly, they found the line energy varies as a power-law function of time, while the ratio of the line width to line energy remains almost constant. Such features provide solid proof of the reality and the GRB origin of these gamma-ray lines. These discoveries shed a new and unique light on the physics of GRBs and their relativistic jets, according to the IHEP.
The US persists in a mistaken perception of China, often viewing China through the lens of its own hegemonic logic. China is not the US and does not aspire to become the US, Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said in a meeting with US Secretary of State Antony Blinken in Laos on Saturday.
"China does not seek hegemony or power politics and has the best record among major powers on peace and security issues," Wang said. He warned that the risks facing China-US relations are still accumulating, and challenges are on the rise.
"The bilateral relationship is at a critical juncture where it needs to be stabilized and improved, requiring continuous adjustment of direction, risk management, proper handling of differences, elimination of interference and promotion of cooperation," he said.
Wang, also a member of the Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China Central Committee, met with Blinken in Vientiane at the latter's request. The two sides exchanged views on China-US relations and agreed to maintain communication at all levels and further implement the important consensus reached during the heads of state meeting in San Francisco.
During the meeting, he emphasized the importance for the US to understand the CPC and China's present and future as well as the CPC's aspiration to seek happiness for the people and rejuvenation for the nation while adhering to the path of peaceful development.
Over the past three months, the two sides have maintained communication through diplomatic, financial, law enforcement, and climate change teams, as well as military channels, and people-to-people exchanges have also been increasing, Wang said. However, it must be pointed out that the US has not ceased its containment and suppression of China and has even intensified these actions in some cases.
Wang said that China's policy toward the US remains consistent, adhering to mutual respect, peaceful coexistence, and win-win cooperation. He urged the US to return to a rational and pragmatic policy toward China. "Both sides should work together to promote stable, healthy, and sustainable development of China-US relations," he said.
Blinken said that the US is actively committed to stabilizing US-China relations and adheres to the one-China policy. The US looks forward to maintaining regular communication with China and continuing cooperation on issues such as drug control and artificial intelligence. The US is willing to manage differences, avoid misunderstandings and misjudgments.
Li Haidong, a professor at the China Foreign Affairs University, told the Global Times on Saturday that Wang's remarks "once again demonstrate to the US that China is responsibly managing China-US relations and hopes to develop them in a direction of cooperation and mutual benefit. The statements are highly responsible, forward-looking, and constructive."
Regarding the Taiwan question, Wang stated that Taiwan is part of China and will never be a country, neither in the past nor in the future. "Taiwan independence" and peace in the Taiwan Straits are incompatible. Every provocation by "Taiwan independence" forces will be met with countermeasures, he warned.
Wang elaborated on the rights and wrongs relating to the Ren'ai Jiao issue, pointing out that China has reached a temporary arrangement with the Philippines to manage the situation. The Philippines should keep its word and stop transporting construction materials, and the US should stop fanning the flames, disrupting, and undermining maritime stability, he said.
Li told the Global Times that the main risk in current China-US relations lies in the US' inability to tolerate China's rise in comprehensive strength and international influence.
"This does not conform to the US' tradition of maintaining its own advantage and certainly not to its hegemonic mindset and tradition. Another critical issue is the US' strong tendency to blame China for its internal problems, viewed as 'curing internal issues with external measures,'" he said.
"Additionally, the US attributes its declining global influence to China. This is extremely dangerous and deserves condemnation. Therefore, in Wang's exchange with Blinken, he frankly pointed out these issues. This candor could help the US reflect and possibly make adjustments. If the US fails to reflect and continues the wrong path, it won't solve its problems, and maintaining international order and security will also be problematic," Li said.
Wang pointed out that China's position on the Ukraine issue is open and honest, adding that China will continue to promote peace talks. The US should stop the excessive use of unilateral sanctions and long-arm jurisdiction.
"China opposes smearing and framing, does not accept coercion or blackmail, and will take resolute and forceful measures to safeguard its major interests and legitimate rights," Wang said.
Li noted that the US not only fails to reflect on, but also flaunts its power and insists on a zero-sum mindset of winning and losing in the war in the Ukraine issue.
"The US should have the courage to take responsibility and not shift the blame for its responsibilities and failures in the Ukraine crisis onto China."
The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), the country's top securities regulator, vowed on Monday to effectively maintain the smooth operation of the capital market, strengthen comprehensive research and response to market risks, and improve the targeted effectiveness of trading regulation.
The CSRC on Monday held a conference to study and implement the spirit of the third plenary session of the 20th Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, deploying work to further comprehensively deepen reform of the capital market as well as the key work in the second half of the year.
The CSRC said it will ramp up greater efforts to serve the rebound of the real economy, deepen the registration-based IPO system and cultivate high-quality listed companies. It will also make efforts to prevent and resolve risks in key areas such as private equity funds, trading venues, bond defaults and industry organizations, in addition to enhancing the effectiveness of supervision and law enforcement.
The meeting noted that at present, China's capital market has reached the stage of accelerating the transformation to high-quality development. Further deepening overall reform is needed to remove the institutional barriers and resolve structural issues, as well as accelerating the construction of a safe, standardized, transparent, open, dynamic and resilient capital market.
The commission will establish a long-term mechanism to enhance the internal stability of the capital market, and better serve high-level sci-tech self-reliance and the development of new quality productive forces, including enhancing the ability to provide full-chain services to sci-tech innovation enterprises.
It also vows to effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of investors and deepen the self-revolution of the CSRC system.
According to a communique adopted by the third plenary session, the country will pursue coordinated reforms in the fiscal, tax, financial and other major sectors, and work to enhance the consistency of macro policy orientation.
In addition, it will improve the national strategic planning system and policy coordination mechanisms, deepen reform of the fiscal and taxation systems, further reform the financial system, and improve mechanisms for implementing the coordinated regional development strategy, read the communique.
With NATO's continuous expansion, it is evolving from a regional security alliance into a global organization. The alliance, which celebrated its 75th anniversary with a summit in Washington recently, has played a major role in exacerbating the Russia-Ukraine crisis. As the crisis has been in its third year, how to see the trajectory of the conflict? How likely is the possibility of a nuclear war in today's world? Global Times (GT) reporter Ma Ruiqian recently interviewed Scott Ritter (Ritter), a former US Marine Corps intelligence officer, over these pressing issues.
GT: How do you see the trajectory of the Russia-Ukraine conflict this year? How much more support can the West provide to Ukraine?
Ritter: This is a very difficult war. It's a war that didn't need to be fought and shouldn't have been fought. Russia did not want to invade Ukraine. It's the last thing Russia wanted to do, but they were compelled to take this action because of the irresponsible behavior of the US and NATO, and the European Union. Russia's initial plan was based on putting pressure on Ukraine to accept a rapid peace settlement, but that peace was rejected by the West.
Russia today is better prepared to not only continue this war but is also positioned to win this war more than Ukraine or NATO. Can this be turned around? Unlikely. The amount of investment that would have to be made into Ukraine exceeds the capabilities of NATO and the US. The reinvigoration of military industry is beyond the capacity of Europe at this point in time because of the economic consequences of this conflict and the sanction of Russia, and now that has backfired for Europe and the US.
So far, Russia has prevailed militarily. Now we come to the political endgame. This is where China has to pay attention, too, because how this war ends will likewise impact the West's posture toward Taiwan region. Ukraine is a tool. Taiwan is also a tool of the West. If this tool emerges still usable, still viable, that's a defeat for Russia. Then the West will say we can use Taiwan region as a tool against China. China is participating in discussions about peace, but the peace between Russia and Ukraine, in large part, will determine the future potential for conflict between China and the US over Taiwan region. How this war ends in Ukraine is very important for dictating the future of war or peace in the Pacific.
GT: NATO is reportedly in talks to deploy more nuclear weapons. How likely is the possibility of a nuclear war in today's world?
Ritter: We are closer to nuclear war today than we have been at any time. The US is not an honest partner. The US continues to view nuclear weapons as an expression of American supremacy, believing that we must be the supreme nuclear power. China has, historically speaking, had a very pragmatic and responsible approach to nuclear weapons. China has never used the nuclear bomb, but it has developed nuclear capabilities to provide a deterrent against the American nuclear system. However, the US has positioned itself to have the potential for a preemptive attack that could neutralize China's nuclear deterrent. This takes us away from deterrence theory and into war-fighting theory. This is a very dangerous place to be. When you look at the irresponsible expression of American nuclear policy, which now extends to NATO, it talks about putting a certain number of nuclear weapons on operational standby so they can be used quickly. When we talk about fighting a war with the assumption that nuclear weapons are going to be used, it means that if there is a war, there's a high probability nuclear weapons will become part of it. And that is a disaster for humanity.
If I'm a Chinese diplomat, and perhaps the diplomat shares my opinion about the danger we face, what can be done? How do we begin to approach a nation that is very aggressive and incapable of negotiating in good faith? The US has to change. We have to change our approach to nuclear weapons and how we deal with the world. But we're an empire in decline. When an empire is in decline, it tends to fall back on its strongest position. Right now, the US is very strong in nuclear weapons, so we're falling back on the nuclear shield, which makes everything going forward even more dangerous. If the nuclear option becomes our only option, there is a real potential for nuclear war.
GT: Ahead of the NATO summit, China hosted the Conference Marking the 70th Anniversary of the Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence. The Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit, which China is a major participant, was held in Kazakhstan. How do you compare China's and the US' contributions and concepts regarding world peace?
Ritter: When you compare the Chinese approach with the NATO approach, you see that China is doing a very good job, behaving very responsibly, and looking for alternatives to conflict. Why is the SCO succeeding? Why do so many people want to join BRICS? Because these are viable alternatives for the rest of the world. China is a very responsible global leader, sitting down with the world and trying to articulate a common position on the peaceful resolution of global problems. China wants good relations with the West.
NATO, on the other hand, only talks about war and confrontation. NATO is a tool of the US. And the US is seeking to use NATO to bolster its weakened position in the Pacific and to get NATO expanded into the Pacific. This is one of the things that was discussed at the NATO summit.
Also, it's the US that is being irresponsible in terms of responding to China's activities in the South China Sea. It's the US that is building military alliances to contain China militarily. China is economically defeating the US that the Chinese model of global development is more efficient than its American counterpart. Since we can't compete with China economically, we seek to move to where we feel we have the advantage, which is military confrontation.
GT: From the Ukraine crisis to the Gaza crisis, how have the so-called universal values of the West been influenced?
Ritter: I think Gaza is exposing the ugliness of the US. The tragedy is that the US has lost all credibility when it comes to the very things that should define us, the universal human values. When you take a look at Gaza, it's such a contradiction of what we claim to stand for and what we do. It's so gross that it allows people to legitimately say that the US is a fraud. When that is exposed as a lie, our existence becomes meaningless. This would be a dark thing for the US and for the world. I'm afraid that Gaza is showing that the US dream of human rights and liberty is a fantasy and that the US has stopped working to make it a reality.
GT: Julian Assange gained "freedom" after pleading guilty last month. Reflecting on your experience of having your passport confiscated by the US State Department on your way to Russia, what are your thoughts on the so-called human rights and freedom in the US?
Ritter: It's a dark day for the US, when you find out that there is no free speech, that there is no freedom of association, that it's all a lie — that the government controls you instead of you controlling the government. Julian Assange was arrested for exercising free speech as part of a free press. He committed no crime. In doing so, the US sent the signal to every American: if you challenge us, we will break you, we will arrest you, we will destroy you. They've sent that message to me many times, and they tried to send it again by taking my passport. But I'm going to get my passport back, and I will continue to travel. I will continue to speak to defend the free speech, free press and freedom of association in the US.
There is full confidence that China will be able to achieve its full-year GDP growth target of around 5 percent in 2024, as the resolution on further deepening reform comprehensively to advance Chinese modernization adopted at the just concluded third plenary session of the 20th Communist Party of China Central Committee has injected fresh growth momentum to the economy, an expert said on Thursday.
China's economic growth rate is expected to reach around 5 percent in the second half of the year, and as a result, the economy is expected to achieve its pre-set annual target. This year, China's contribution to the world economy may still remain at a high level, casting itself as a key driver of the global economic recovery, Li Xuesong, director of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences' Institute of Quantitative and Technological Economics, told the Global Times.
From now to 2035, the foundation supporting the high-quality development of China's economy remains solid, Li said at a seminar held in Beijing on Thursday, noting that China's economy is expected to maintain a significant growth potential over the period.
"The new technological revolution offers strategic opportunities for high-quality development. A robust industrial foundation provides continuous momentum. A vast market generates demand traction and the comprehensive guarantee of production factors offers solid support," he said.
Debunking some Western media outlets' smearing of China's economic prospects citing so-called disappearance of the demographic dividend, Li said the country's advantages in the quality and quantity of the labor force persist.
The working-age population remains sizable, contributing talent and labor to economic growth. In addition, continued improvements in the health and education level of labor force facilitate the rapid accumulation of demographic quality dividends. Third, new urbanization drives ongoing improvements in the distribution of labor in various regions, offering substantial potential for enhancing the efficiency of labor resource allocation, he said.
After China reported a steady 5 percent GDP growth for the first half of 2024, multiple international organizations and banks have maintained their forecast of 5 percent GDP growth for China this year, thanks to remarkable performances in areas such as exports, even as many major economies and the global economy as a whole face serious downward pressure.
Looking ahead, Li said China should foster the high-quality development by seeking major upgrades in three aspects. "We should leverage the advantages of the hyperscale market to drive demand expansion, enhance quality, and facilitate structural upgrading. In addition, we should accelerate the iterative process of supply and promote structural upgrading, while driving sustained efficiency enhancement and structural advancement," he said.
He called for efforts to boost the synergistic growth of traditional and emerging industries, and foster the development of new quality productive forces.
Li noted that the Chinese government has accorded paramount importance to the stable and healthy development of the real estate market, with a series of policy adjustments.
In addition to current policies, we can explore the establishment of specialized asset management agencies to take over and restructure certain real estate enterprises in the future, Li said.
China is a key driver of world economic growth. According to the IMF's research, every 1 percentage point increase in China's economic growth will lead to a 0.3 percentage point increase in the growth of other economies. As the world's second-largest economy, China has added important stability to the world economy, Li said.
Key investment projects are set to improve the quality of China-Russia trade and provide further impetus for bilateral trade to reach $300 billion by 2030, Chinese experts said on Tuesday, as cooperation meetings were held in Russia this week.
Russian and Chinese authorities agreed to update the list of significant projects during a meeting of the Sino-Russian intergovernmental commission on investment cooperation, Russian news agency TASS reported on Tuesday, citing First Deputy Prime Minister of Russia Denis Manturov.
Chinese Vice Premier Ding Xuexiang is in Russia from Sunday to Tuesday, co-chairing the meeting as well as the 21st meeting of the China-Russia Energy Cooperation Committee and attending the sixth China-Russia Energy Business Forum.
"I consider our meeting to be rather timely and fruitful. Reaching agreements on updating the list of significant projects is very important. There are more than 60 initiatives with the total amount of declared investment exceeding $138 billion," Manturov said.
"We also saw trade rise so far this year, and it has the potential to rise to $300 billion by 2030, according to our estimates," Manturov said.
Ding said that the two sides have strengthened the top-level design of investment cooperation, steadily promoted cooperation on key projects, created new highlights in sub-national cooperation, and achieved new positive results, according to the Xinhua News Agency.
The potential of investment cooperation should be tapped, and sub-national cooperation should be better carried out, Ding said, adding that the two sides should strengthen policy support and actively create a favorable investment environment.
Observers said that frequent and continuous high-level official exchanges and intensified cooperation among localities in recent weeks showed that concrete steps were being taken in line with the strategic guidance of the two heads of state. These meetings and exchanges will further boost bilateral trade and economic cooperation, especially investment.
Song Kui, president of the Contemporary China-Russia Regional Economy Research Institute, told the Global Times on Tuesday that trade between China and Russia is in a state of vital transition, as industrial cooperation featuring key projects will vastly improve the quality of bilateral trade and the trade structure.
"This is a major change. Key project cooperation will become a symbol of higher-level bilateral cooperation," Song said.
Bilateral trade grew fast in recent years, hitting a record of $240.11 billion last year, up 26.3 percent year-on-year, customs data showed. However, trade growth slowed in the first half of this year as the US tightened its unilateral sanctions on Russia. In the first six months, bilateral trade reached $116.87 billion, up 1.8 percent year-on-year.
Bilateral cooperation on key projects will greatly enhance the cross-border flow of productive factors, improve the quality of trade toward high-level development and become a new engine to drive trade higher, Song said, noting that more processed Russian goods with higher added value will be traded in addition to the current range of basic resources and materials.
Even as bilateral trade growth was affected by the intensified US financial crackdown during the first half, there's still a good chance of meaningful growth for the full year as more work is being done to improve the financial infrastructure to counter the impact of US sanctions, with possible breakthroughs in the second half, Song noted.
More than 90 percent of mutual payments in bilateral trade are now conducted in national currencies, TASS reported, citing Manturov.
China and Russia are actively advancing bilateral cooperation despite external disruptions, with the two sides zooming in on expanding trade and improving its quality, Zhang Hong, an associate research fellow at the Institute of Russian, Eastern European and Central Asian Studies of the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, told the Global Times.
China has delivered the world's first 14,000 cubic meters liquefied natural gas (LNG) bunkering and transport vessel capable of river-sea navigation in Shanghai, breaking international technology barriers with a record of more than 85 percent in the localization rate.
The vessel, Huaihe Nengyuan Qihang, built by Hudong-Zhonghua Shipbuilding (Group) Co, a subsidiary of the China State Shipbuilding Corp, was delivered and named in Shanghai two months ahead of schedule, the company told the Global Times on Sunday.
The completion of the vessel is of great significance for implementing the carbon emissions reduction strategy along the Yangtze River, promoting LNG-powered vessel refueling in the Yangtze River Basin, and opening up inland LNG vessel transport channels, according to the vessel's builder.
The ship is 130 meters long, 23.6 meters wide and has a depth molded level of 15 meters. Its dual-fuel propulsion system allows the vessel to navigate along the Yangtze River as well as in deep-sea areas.
The delivery of the ship reflects the application of several localization technological breakthroughs, especially within the main equipment used in the vessel's cooling system, and other facilities such as LNG compressors and incinerators, dual-fuel power generator sets, the vessel's power distribution system, and electric propulsion systems.
Multiple domestically made components mean the ship has a localization rate of more than 85 percent, making it China's LNG storage and transport equipment with the highest localization rate, according to the company.
Hudong-Zhonghua said that the Yangtze River is China's major east-west waterway, with an annual water transport capacity exceeding 3 billion tons, accounting for more than 60 percent of the country's total inland waterway transportation.
For a long time, the Yangtze River water transport has relied on vessels powered by diesel and heavy oil, leading to increasingly severe environmental pollution issues.
In June 2023, the "Initiative of E-Yangtze River" was jointly released by the Ministry of Transport and 13 provinces and cities, aiming to address the carbon emission issues of the river.
Chinese embassies in 14 Central and Eastern European countries, including Greece, Poland and Hungary, have announced that China will grant five-year multiple-entry visas to citizens of these countries who hold a valid ordinary passport and meet all relevant requirements to visit China for business, tourism or family visits, effective on Wednesday.
These measures are being added to China's ongoing efforts to expand visa-free policies and streamline entry procedures for inbound tourism, aimed at accelerating the country's high-level opening-up to shore up the comprehensive economic revival, analysts said.
Foreign tourists' enthusiasm for visiting China has surged. According to a report sent by Tongcheng Travel to the Global Times, the number of foreign visitors to some domestic tourist cities has increased significantly during the peak summer travel season.
The robust demand has greatly boosted hotel bookings and tourist spending in major cities. In the first half of this year, foreign bookings for various branded hotels on the eLong hotel-booking platform nearly doubled year-on-year. Hotel bookings by foreign guests are expected to continue growing momentum during the summer, according to the report.
China has implemented measures to revive inbound tourism after the COVID-19 pandemic. In June, China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs announced a unilateral 15-day visa-free entry pilot for New Zealand, Australia and Poland, increasing eligible countries for the policy to 15 days since November 2023. Experts note that the further relaxation of entry restrictions will provide a significant boost to both domestic and international tourism markets.
The strength of China's tourism reflects higher household incomes, service innovation and a shift towards visceral and cultural experiences in line with consumer preferences, UBS' Chief Investment Office said recently, highlighting tourism as a key driver of China's consumption upgrade and high-quality development.
A series of inbound facilitation policies have spurred a consumption recovery across China's tourism market, drawing a large influx of foreign visitors recently, Zhang Lingyun, executive editor-in-chief of Tourism Tribune, told Global Times on Wednesday, noting the surge will stimulate domestic consumption.
"Regarding the market structure, international markets beyond neighboring countries are still ripe for development, holding significant potential for further growth in China's inbound tourism," Zhang said, calling industries to evolve their marketing approaches based on the characteristics of customer groups from different countries.
Data from the National Immigration Administration showed that in the first half of the year, foreigners entered China through various ports amounted to 14.635 million in terms of passenger trips, up 152.7 percent year-on-year. Among them, 8.542 million entered visa-free, constituting 52 percent of the total and up 190.1 percent year-on-year.
Chinese airlines are also ramping up international flight capacity in response to high demand. Air China's routes will exceed 90 percent of the 2019 levels this summer, totaling 114 routes across 43 countries and regions worldwide. This includes 32 routes with 53 daily flights between China and Europe, surpassing overall flight operations to 116 percent of the 2019 levels.
China's National Development and Reform Commission and other departments have recently issued measures that called for the continuous optimization of entry and exit policies, the expansion of visa-free transit policies, an increase in the frequency of entry flights, and the introduction of more high-quality inbound tourism products and services to create new consumer options, while cultivating new growth points.
On June 22, 10 days after the European Commission (EC), the executive branch of the EU, announced provisional duties on Chinese electric vehicles (EVs), Chinese Commerce Minister Wang Wentao held a video call with Valdis Dombrovskis, executive vice president of the EC, during which they agreed to start consultations over the dispute. The very next day, on June 23, China dispatched a working group to Europe for the talks. Since then, multiple rounds of consultations at the technical level have been held via video link.
For those who are concerned about escalating trade tensions between China and the EU, the talks should offer some relief. However, even as expectations are running high for the two sides to focus on the talks to properly resolve the dispute and avert further dangerous escalation, a handful of EU politicians appear to be resorting to gamesmanship, which highlights the EC's lack of sincerity in the talks, undermining the consultation process.
The latest example is, on July 7, EU Ambassador to China Jorge Toledo asserted that the EU had offered to engage in consultations with China "for months," but "it was only nine days ago" that the Chinese side agreed to begin this process. This claim was immediately refuted by the Chinese Ministry of Commerce (MOFCOM), which said the assertion is "seriously inconsistent with the facts." MOFCOM offered a detailed account of China's efforts to seek consultations, including a letter from Wang to Dombrovskis requesting talks, dated as early as October 24, 2023, shortly after the EU formally launched the probe.
Toledo is not alone in the EU's apparent attempt to shift blame after the EC's decision sparked a widespread backlash, including from some leaders of EU member states and EU businesses. On July 4, the EC released a Commission Implementing Regulation for the imposition of the provisional countervailing duties. The document, which is more than 200 pages in length, was clearly aimed at justifying the EU-launched investigation and its subsequent decision, but it failed to conceal the loopholes and flaws in the investigation.
"By making these false allegations, the EU aims to add pressure on China during the consultations to gain more bargaining chips. On the other hand, the EU wants to show a hard-line stance toward China to deflect the bloc's internal conflicts," Jian Junbo, deputy director of the Center for China-Europe Relations at Fudan University's Institute of International Studies, told the Global Times. He noted that faced with strong opposition from within the bloc, the EU wants to shirk its responsibility to China.
Presumption of guilt
Staggeringly, the EC document also largely confirmed a detailed account of the EC's problematic investigation process that the Global Times published on June 21, based on information provided by those with knowledge of events.
For example, the document said that the EC initiated the probe "on its own initiative," claimed that there was "sufficient evidence" from readily available information that Chinese firms benefited from subsidies, and asserted that based on "market information from various independent sources" it determines Chinese EVs "negatively affect" EU industry. Chinese officials and experts have repeatedly said the EC's probe was not launched at the request of EU industry, which is very rare in such probes, and the EC, playing the role of "the judge," already deemed Chinese EV firms "guilty" even before the probe began, meaning the subsequent procedures were only aimed at finding proof to back its presumption of guilt.
This working approach is evident throughout the investigation process, which clearly shows the EC was only interested in piecing together any information that it felt useful to support its predetermined ruling. In responding to criticism about its process, the EC document argued that EC President Ursula von der Leyen's announcement in a speech on September 13, 2023 did not constitute the initiation, and the Chinese side was notified on September 22, 2023. This, too, confirmed the Chinese side's account that the EC's initiation and notification process was extremely problematic, reflecting its lack of sincerity in engaging in pre-initiation consultations.
According to information obtained by the Global Times, the Chinese side was only given one working day to prepare, with the first round of consultations held on October 2, the second day of China's weeklong National Day holidays.
Manufacturing evidence
To back its presumption about Chinese firms benefiting from government subsidies, the EC offered the so-called extensive "evidence" in its 200-page document. However, a closer look at its content reveals how the EC sought to churn out evidence to "support" its decision. The EC essentially cherry-picked publicly available information regarding China's policies, relied on discrimination against China's economic system pertinent to state-owned banks and enterprises, and bullied Chinese firms while also labeling them as "uncooperative."
For example, the EC document included numerous pages about Chinese economic development plans and industrial policies, essentially translating the part it deems to serve its purpose. However, it is far-fetched to use official policy documents as evidence that the Chinese EV industry unfairly benefited from subsidies. China is not the only country or region in the world that has long-term development plans and industrial policies.
Zhou Mi, a senior research fellow at the Chinese Academy of International Trade and Economic Cooperation, said that all countries have various industrial policies, including many in the EU. One could hardly say "that EU and US companies haven't received any subsidies," Zhou told the Global Times.
The EC document appears to acknowledge that the EU also hands out subsidies to companies, but it asserted that "not all subsidies are countervailable under the SCM Agreement," referring to the WTO's Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures.
The EC's claims showed the discriminatory nature of its crackdown on Chinese EVs.
In the document, the EC also counted China's preferential policies as subsidies for EV companies. However, many countries and regions around the world, including EU members, also offer preferential policies to attract investments. The EC also claimed that China's state-owned financial institutions, and even battery suppliers, were acting as "public bodies." Even private financial institutions, including foreign-owned banks, were accused of being directed to subsidize EV companies.
Chinese experts pointed out the staggering double-standards and discrimination from the EC, in that it conveniently turns internationally standard practice into a unique Chinese matter in order to support its presumption of guilt against Chinese EV firms.
Cui Fan, a professor at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing, said that the EC counted banks and battery firms as "public bodies," because only public bodies can be sources of subsidies. And the EC lacks any definitive basis in international trade rules to support its position, Cui told the Global Times.
The EU also has its own financial institutions that back its development plans. For example, the European Investment Bank (EIB) said in a document in 2022 that "as the EU climate bank, the EIB remains committed to have at least 50 percent of the Bank's overall financing activity support climate action and environmental sustainability by 2025 in line with the Climate Bank Roadmap." By the EC's logic, should China launch anti-subsidy investigations into all EU industries and companies which received loans from the EIB?
Discrimination, bullying
The EC's July 4 document also confirmed accounts from Chinese officials, experts and businesses that the EC's investigation was discriminatory against Chinese EVs and that it sought to bully Chinese companies into giving up sensitive commercial secrets.
According to the document, the EC investigation sought extensive information, including extensive lists of raw materials, components, and instructions required to manufacture a product. It also sought companies' investment plans, bank authorizations, credit lines, land use rights, and numerous other kinds of information.
An auto industry insider said that it is "absolutely true" that there was a lot of excessive questioning.
"They were looking into things that absolutely didn't matter such as who owned the land where our headquarters is located. They were looking into future product plans, like sensitive business issues that had nothing to do with the facts at hand," the auto industry insider told the Global Times on condition of anonymity, calling the investigation process a "huge mess."
Moreover, the companies weren't given sufficient time to complete the complicated and extensive questionnaire, and if they did not provide certain information, they would face harsh penalties from the EC, businesses and experts said.
Consultations undermined
The EC's latest attempt to shift blame for its ill-advised, badly executed probe is futile, and it only further exposes the serious flaws in its own process. This could undermine the ongoing talks to resolve the dispute, experts said.
Jian also said that the EU's move risks impeding the ongoing consultations. Although the consultations are challenging and highly complex, there is still hope that they could contribute to easing China-EU economic and trade tensions, he said, if the talks are carried out based on the basis of equality.
Crucially, for the talks to proceed smoothly and to achieve a positive outcome, there also needs to be a shift in the EC's attitude, in that it has to show sincerity, Cui Hongjian, a professor with the Academy of Regional and Global Governance with Beijing Foreign Studies University, told the Global Times.
"If the EU does not make adjustments and changes from its current position, the talks will not be able to succeed," Cui Hongjian said.
